In today's so called democracies around the world, before each election, selected group of candidates are introduced on the main stream media as "popular new outsiders" and no one has an option to vote against them: this is dictatorship hiding behind a circus, however:
INTRODUCING THE "AGAINST" VOTE OPTION IN ELECTIONS WILL CHANGE ABSOLUTELY EVERYTHING RELATED TO POLITICS, and everything in our world as we know it, because first of all it will finally give a voice to all the people who oppose establishment's top celebrities, (which are usually presented as evil, with criticism, compared to dictators,) and 2. it will discourage people from voting out of fear, for "the lesser evil" which are usually presented by the establishment media as "maybe not the best choice, but according to the polls, the only one having a chance right now to defeat the real evil."
So if a candidate that was very well publicized or criticized receives 10 million "for" votes, from the people to whom he promised free health massage, free wall or additional benefits for the military families, but also gets 20 million "against" votes, from the people who do not wish to give out free health massages, build free walls, or give more money to bomb children in other countries, then, a simple grass roots candidate who was excluded from establishment media debates and only managed to get 1 million "for" votes, (the required minimum to avoid confusion), but even less "against" votes, since he never promised to take away and give away free this or free that, still wins, because Hollywood's big shots and televised celebrities are judged not only by their popularity, but by all the voters.
The plan is very simple: all of us around the world, on social media, who do not seek political careers, (that makes us a very small minority, because vast majority of politically active people on social media, do seek political careers,) those of us who do not, talk about to popularize this movement in USA, outside of the establishment media, which will appoint candidates for senate, congress and president, to be elected for the sole purpose to pass an act, that will require all elections to have the against vote option. That's it. No donations, no criticizing others, no hypocrisy, no politicians.
In a global political system which they call democracy, where voters are not allowed to vote against candidates, criticizing them is not only useless, it is counter productive, because it reminds and encourages a portion of audience to vote for those that are criticized and talked about, since not everyone agrees with the critics. And if for example a candidate is criticized for intending to rob some people, this will attract some voters to him who are interested in robbing some people! it may not be majority, but it does not matter when our so called presidents are elected by a small percentage of population anyway. In such a system, freedom of speech is obsolete, and this democracy glitch should be obvious to critics, but it never is, because their primary concern with criticism, is to create a recognition for themselves, not any type of solution)
**COUNTING THE VOTES IN 2020 ELECTIONS: We already know we cannot trust the establishment to do the vote count, we just know that vast majority did not even vote in their 2016 elections in which they claimed victory, So the only way to count the votes in November 2020, is to start organizing now, in advance, and to be able to hold massive rallies on election day, backed by well organized militia.
**A NON SECRET BALLOT OPTION WILL ALSO BE INTRODUCED: Some people may claim that they would feel intimidated to vote if others can check who they voted for, however they should not dictate to the rest of community that all the votes must be anonymous: If a communities' polling place has been overtaken by a local or international gang for example, it is very easy for them to claim that their candidate won, even if their opponent got 90% of the votes, if all ballots are secret. However, if 20% of voters chose to stay anonymous, but 80% have voted openly and against the establishment's/gang's candidates - then it is immediately clear that elections were rigged.
Many people in many places are not ashamed to have a public record of whom they voted for: as a founder of newworldgovernment.net I for example admit that in 2004 I was ignorant enough to vote for John Kerry, and in 2000 I may have even voted for George Bush, since he was so good at speaking out against wars at the time, I was drunk so I didn't know what I was doing. We all make mistakes: