USE OF NEGATIVE PUBLICITY TO INTRODUCE CONTROLLED OPPOSITION TO THE MASSES:
"CNN HATES DONALD TRUMP!" right? WRONG:
Establishment, understanding that society for the most part does not trust it, is more often than not, using negative publicity and criticism to promote their own trusted circus actors: Bernie Sanders is supposedly being silenced by the establishment media, after being shoved into our faces on establishment's mass media, almost every single day for years now; Joe Biden jumped into presidential race with the "Trump fears me, bribed Ukraine to expose me" scandal; Tulsi Gabbard got a big boost after she was "attacked" by Hillary Clinton, Obama got a boost back in 2007 after he was criticized for his missing flag pin, fake birth certificate and funny name (many of us actually knew he will be selected as president as soon as we heard his name, only because of his name, before he even "rose" in their so called polls).
If for example, instead of all the relentless criticism of Donald Trump, establishment media would have been praising him, talking about how he is a great businessman, a wonderful architect, building his perfectly squared or Arabic Muslim Taj Mahal style structures, a talented actor who's been in so many Hollywood movies, about how he "worked" with Clintons back in the 1990's to "make America great" - then most of his supporters would have been sick of him. But everybody loves a "Maverick" - John McCain "rose" in their so called polls in 2008 as a "Maverick", not as someone who (like Vladimir Putin) has already been working in the "government" system for decades.
In 2014-15, "Hillary for prison" movement was "born" - a year later she became a front runner for president, and supposedly got even more votes than Trump. The entire establishment media announced that "Trump may run for president" - a day before he himself even did, in a nutshell saying: "Look, here's Trump America, we hate him, he is against us, against establishment, he is running for president, don't vote for him, he will end our oligarchy, he's the only alternative to Hillary Clinton, his approval rating is at an all time low of just 80%" - and that's how they got him "elected".
People who are allowed to showcase on establishment media, to criticize the establishment or the "bad" president, are controlled opposition, they are not there by accident.
And America, the police of the world, is not the source of the problem - Global Hypocrisy is: Criticizing America "the great Satan" is mandatory for world leaders to score political points with their local audience, however, it's political industry vs. humanity world wide: Iran, Russia, China and other countries that are supposedly "fed up with Americas' imperialism" could have formed their own alliance and started printing their own money a long time ago, but they are the most comfortable in their privileged positions of power, and would like to keep things just the way they are (just like democrats and republicans)
If international oligarchs who profit from wars and destruction were to openly reveal their intentions to divide USA, divide Middle East, divide Humanity, people will say "NO! we do not want that, we want unity, we want one world, one government is plenty!" But when these known criminals officially claim that they "are trying to create new world order, world government," (with all the crimes they have been committing), then this gives imbeciles who lead the national (controlled) opposition movements, a "valid" reason to oppose this global oligarchy, and with it global unity behind something other than a new celebrity. It's sort of like a story where a homeowner caught a thief inside his fence, and the thief started begging him "mister, do whatever you want, just please don't throw me back over the fence they'll kill me out there". Homeowner thought "aha! that's what the thief fears the most", and so he just threw the thief back over the fence, which is exactly what the thief wanted.